<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keep it stupid simple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomatom.com/2005/11/keep-it-stupid-simple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomatom.com/2005/11/keep-it-stupid-simple/</link>
	<description>The insiders&#039; guide to food and drink in Melbourne. Since 2005.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.tomatom.com/2005/11/keep-it-stupid-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 06:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatom.com/?p=163#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Still learning but still impressed. Not sure about the bank manager though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still learning but still impressed. Not sure about the bank manager though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alanna</title>
		<link>http://www.tomatom.com/2005/11/keep-it-stupid-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Alanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 06:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomatom.com/?p=163#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Interesting self-debate ... I too was disappointed with the 4mp Pentax, even though the earlier 3mp that I got for my sister/her family was wonderful. I DID find that the macro function was, surprisingly enough, far better than what I get on the pocket-sized Nikon Coolpix S1 I settled on ... even though there&#039;s no way I&#039;d ever go back to the Pentax (and in fact sold it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting self-debate &#8230; I too was disappointed with the 4mp Pentax, even though the earlier 3mp that I got for my sister/her family was wonderful. I DID find that the macro function was, surprisingly enough, far better than what I get on the pocket-sized Nikon Coolpix S1 I settled on &#8230; even though there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;d ever go back to the Pentax (and in fact sold it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

